Legal Opinion

Flanders Electric Motor Service, Inc. v. Davall Controls & Engineering

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 1992No. 91CA0060PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Chief Judge STERNBERG.

Flanders Electric Motor Service (Flanders) appeals from the discharge of its writ of garnishment against Gardner-Zemke Co. (G-Z) to recover funds allegedly owed to its judgment debtor, Davall Controls & Engineering (Davall). We affirm.

G-Z was an electrical subcontractor on several construction projects for the Bureau of Reclamation’s Central Arizona Irrigation Project. Davall was a supplier and subcontractor to G-Z, and Flanders was one of Davall’s suppliers.

Flanders obtained a default judgment for $198,888.12 against Davall, and thereafter, it served a writ of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Banek v. ThomasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Hancock v. State, Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. American Bonding Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  4. Baker v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. Haselden Langley Constructors, Inc. v. Graybar Electric Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Munoz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Kim v. Grover C. Coors TrustColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Devenyns v. HartigColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Corcoran v. SannerColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. & 20CA1942 LBA v. LandmarkColorado Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API