Legal Opinion
DIDONATO v. STANLEY BLACK & DECKER
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 9, 2022No. 2:20-cv-04425Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANTHONY DIDONATO, : Plaintiff, : No. 20-cv-4425-JMY : v. : : BLACK & DECKER (U.S.), INC., : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM YOUNGE, J. February 9, 2022 Currently before the Court is the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (hereinafter “MSJ”) (ECF No. 17) in which Defendant raises a Daubert challenge to the expert testimony of Andres J. Calderon, Ph.d. The Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument.1 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7.1(f). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Carol Heller v. Shaw Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.