Legal Opinion

Greenville v. Ormand

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 10, 1897PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Before Gary, J., York, July, 1896. Action by the City Council of Greenville against G. C. Ormand, surviving partner of Ormand & Goforth, Thos. F. Dunlap, administrator of R. J. Dunlap, J. R. Williams, D. K. Armstrong, and John Nichols, to recover an amount advanced to Ormand, survivor, under contract for completion of sewerage system in city of Greenville. Judgment for plaintiff.

Read the full summary

Before Gary, J., York, July, 1896. Action by the City Council of Greenville against G. C. Ormand, surviving partner of Ormand & Goforth, Thos. F. Dunlap, administrator of R. J. Dunlap, J. R. Williams, D. K. Armstrong, and John Nichols, to recover an amount advanced to Ormand, survivor, under contract for completion of sewerage system in city of Greenville. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant sureties appeal. cite: 32 S. C., 288; 9 Wheat., 702; 23 S. C., 590; 6 C. B. (N. S.), 550; 2 Keene, 638; 37 Mo., 466; 36 Minn., 439; 1 Stark., 192; 77 Ga., 40; 5 Md., 602; 39 Kan., 381; 17 S. C., 4; 32 S.…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

This is a case involving the right of sureties. On the 19th day'- of March, 1892, G. C. Ormand and W. L. Goforth entered into a contract with the city of Greenville to perform certain work for said city, in digging trenches for sewerage, and on same day Ormand & Goforth, with appellants as sureties, entered into a bond for faithful performance. Among other things, it was stipulated in the contract that “payments for the work shall be made monthly upon the estimate of the city engineer. Ten per cent, of the amount due shall be retained…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Simonson v. GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Bragg v. ShainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Mayhew v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
  5. Edmondston v. Drake & MitchelSupreme Court of the United States · 1831

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wehrung v. DenhamOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Francis Marion Hotel v. ChiccoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  3. MacK Manufacturing Co. v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Citizens Building & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1917
  5. National Surety Co. v. State Ex Rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API