Legal Opinion

Edmondston v. Drake & Mitchel

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 14, 1831PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court of South Carolina. The leading facts in. this case, from the record, were : Messrs. JohD & Thomas Hobson, of Columbia, in the state of South Carolina, being desirous of making a speculation in coffee, and Thomas Robson, one of the firm, being about to proceed immediately to Havana, in execution of this purpose, procured from Charles Edmondston, of Charleston, the plaintiff in error, a letter of credit, dated the 16th of April 1825, to Castillo &…

Read the full summary

Error to the Circuit Court of South Carolina. The leading facts in. this case, from the record, were : Messrs. JohD & Thomas Hobson, of Columbia, in the state of South Carolina, being desirous of making a speculation in coffee, and Thomas Robson, one of the firm, being about to proceed immediately to Havana, in execution of this purpose, procured from Charles Edmondston, of Charleston, the plaintiff in error, a letter of credit, dated the 16th of April 1825, to Castillo & Black, of Havana, in the island of Cuba, in these words : Charleston, 16th April 1825. Messrs. Castillo & Black :…

1Opinion of the Court

Marshall, Ch. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court. — This suit was instituted by Drake & Mitchel, merchants of Havana, in Cuba, against Charles Edmondston, merchant, of Charleston, in the court of the United States for the sixth circuit and district of South Carolina ; in order to recover the balance of an account due to Drake & Mitchel from J. & T. Robson, who were merchants and partners of Columbia, in South Carolina.

Thomas Robson, being about to proceed to the Havana, for the purpose of making a speculation in coffee, obtained from Edmonston the following letter of credit.

Charleston,…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. Douglass v. HowlandNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  2. Central Savings Bank v. ShineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  3. Lachman & Jacobi v. Henry Block & Bro.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
  4. Walker v. ForbesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  5. Craft v. IshamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1838

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API