Legal Opinion

Woodruff v. Meade County Board of Commissioners

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1995No. 18490, 18491PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

In Woodruff v. Meade County, 522 N.W.2d 771 (S.D.1994) (Woodruff I), we reinstated the county commission’s decision not to renew Ron Woodruffs malt beverage license. Rehearing was granted to reconsider Wood-ruffs due process claims. Finding that he received requisite due process, we affirm our decision in Woodruff I.

*385FACTS

Ron Woodruff owns and operates Buffalo Beer, a beer establishment located on the Buffalo Chip Campground near Sturgis, South Dakota. The business is typically open only during the annual Sturgis motorcycle rally. Although it had renewed one-year malt…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Bundo v. City of Walled LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Rushmore State Bank v. Kurylas, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. City of Wyoming v. Illinois Liquor Control CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Janssen v. MaxamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hanig v. City of WinnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Hanig v. City of WinnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Woodruff v. Meade County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API