Legal Opinion
Hanig v. City of Winner
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 19, 2005No. NonePublished
1Opinion of the Court
692 N.W.2d 202 (2005)
2005 SD 10
Tony HANIG, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
CITY OF WINNER, Defendant and Appellee.
No. 23208.
Supreme Court of South Dakota.
Considered on Briefs November 15, 2004.
Decided January 19, 2005.
George F. Johnson of Johnson, Eklund, Gregory, South Dakota, Attorneys for plaintiff and appellant.
Michael A. Henderson of Cadwell, Sanford, Deibert & Garry, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Attorneys for defendant and appellee.
MEIERHENRY, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Hanig's application for the renewal of his liquor license was denied by the City of Winner. Hanig believed the public hearing on the…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.