Legal Opinion
Woodruff v. Meade County Board of Commissioners
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 6, 1995No. 18490, 18491Published
1Opinion of the Court
537 N.W.2d 384 (1995)
Rod WOODRUFF, d/b/a Buffalo Beer, Appellee,
v.
MEADE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Appellant.
Nos. 18490, 18491.
Supreme Court of South Dakota.
Considered on Rehearing February 13, 1995.
Decided September 6, 1995.
David M. Dillon, Costello, Porter, Hill, Heisterkamp and Bushnell, Rapid City, for appellee.
Bryce A. Flint and Michael J. Jackley, Meade County State's Attorney, Sturgis, for appellant.
KONENKAMP, Justice.
In Woodruff v. Meade County, 522 N.W.2d 771 (S.D.1994) (Woodruff I), we reinstated the county commission's decision not to renew Ron Woodruff's malt beverage license.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bundo v. City of Walled LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Rushmore State Bank v. Kurylas, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- City of Wyoming v. Illinois Liquor Control CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Janssen v. MaxamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.