Legal Opinion
Ne-Bo-Shone Ass'n, Inc. v. Hogarth
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided February 17, 1934No. 2605PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAYMOND, District Judge.
The substantial purpose of this action is to determine whether or not the general public has the right to take fish from that portion of Pine river which traverses plaintiff’s property. Pine river is a rapid and. tortuous stream, approximately 100 miles in length, which flows in a northwesterly direction through four Michigan counties and empties into the Manistee river. From August, 1925, a large portion of the lands through which the river flows was owned by the Ne-Bo-Shone Association, organized as a voluntary association. On November 7, 1932, this voluntary…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- The Propeller Genesee Chief v. FitzhughSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Wilkinson v. LelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Baker v. MacKCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Day v. ArmstrongWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
- J.J.N.P. Co. v. State Ex Rel. Division of Wildlife ResourcesUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Flynn v. BeiselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Dale R. Rizzi v. Underwater Construction CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.