Legal Opinion

Fox v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 2009No. 1774 C.D. 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge PELLEGRINI.

James Fox, Jr. (Claimant) appeals an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) upholding the order of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) that granted PECO Energy Company (Employer) subrogation rights against Fox’s third-party recovery against the City of Philadelphia (City). The real party in interest, though, is the City who has agreed to reimburse Claimant for any sums he had to pay to satisfy Employer’s subrogation claims. The Claimant, through the City, maintains that the Employer has no subrogation rights where a governmental entity is the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Borough of Heidelberg v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Murphy v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. In re Appeal of Tenet Healthsystems Bucks County, LLCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Hankee v. Wilkes-Barre/Scranton International AirportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frazier v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Oliver v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Oliver v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API