Legal Opinion

United States v. Shor

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 16, 2008No. 07-2334PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge.

Steven Shor challenges the sentence imposed by the district court on the grounds that the presentence report improperly calculated his criminal history. Because we find that the district court properly calculated his sentence, we AFFIRM.

I

Steven Shor pled guilty to a charge of conspiracy to distribute ecstasy pursuant to Fed. R.Crim. Pro. 11. His plea agreement calculated a criminal history category of I and an offense level of 21, yielding a guidelines range of 37-46 months. However, the presentence report uncovered additional criminal history — an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. Alfonso HaydenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Michael Anthony HidalgoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. HinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Delgado-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Roy PrattCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Kaycee HeardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
  4. United States v. Colburn KinzerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. (HC) Johnson v. MattesonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API