Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Anthony Hidalgo

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 8, 1991No. 89-50457PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TANNER, District Judge:

Michael Anthony Hidalgo appeals his sentence under the sentencing guidelines, after a guilty plea, for unarmed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). He argues that the district court erred by including a 1977 robbery conviction and then determining that he was a career offender pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 et seq. 1 We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We reverse and remand to the district court for resentencing.

I

On May 2, 1989, an indictment was filed which charged Hidalgo with four counts of unarmed bank robbery in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. NavarroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Tuten v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. Michael James Brady, United States of America v. Andre Michelle LoweCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. People v. JacobCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. HovsepianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Byron Paredes-Urrestarazu v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Anthony Maurice McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Philip Scott AshburnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Joseph Edmund Beaulieau, A/K/A Ed Beaulieau and Thomas TownsendCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API