Legal Opinion

Ingenuit v. Harriff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 5, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of an employment contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ambrosio, J.), dated January 7, 2008, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion to strike his demand for a jury trial.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The main relief sought by the plaintiffs in this action is an injunction against the defendant’s continued solicitation of the plaintiffs’ clients and use of the plaintiffs’ proprietary information to unfairly compete against them. Since the primary character of the case is equitable…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Magill v. Dutchess Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Homburger v. LevitinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Downtown Art Co. v. ZimmermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Agrawal v. RazgaitisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API