Legal Opinion

Magill v. Dutchess Bank & Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1989PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for losses to the beneficiaries of a testamentary trust caused by the defendant cotrustee’s alleged breach of trust, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), dated June 10, 1988, which denied its motion to strike the plaintiffs’ demand for a jury trial.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendant’s motion to strike the plaintiffs’ demand for a jury trial is granted.

The plaintiffs, beneficiaries of a testamentary trust, commenced this action against the defendant, a cotrustee, to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bell v. . MerrifieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Boughton v. . FlintNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Van Rensselaer v. . Van RensselaerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Dixon v. Northwestern National Bank of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1969
  5. In re the Estate of LuriaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kann v. KannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Balta v. AYCO COMPANY, LPDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
  3. In re the Estate of SacklerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Walter v. DraysonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2007
  5. Margesson v. Bank of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API