Legal Opinion
Homburger v. Levitin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 23, 1988PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*584Following an inquest that was ordered after the appellants’ answer was stricken because of their failure to produce certain records for discovery and inspection, the defendant Levi-tin, the sole general partner in the defendant Ocean Parkway Medical Building, was directed to pay his limited partner, the plaintiff Hans Homburger, a sum of money representing the latter’s share of the profits due him from his investment in the partnership.
On appeal the appellants contend with respect to the order dated September 29, 1987 that they were denied equal protection and due process rights when, as the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Jamaica Savings Bank v. M. S. Investing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance v. ConwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
3Cited by5 opinions
- Agrawal v. RazgaitisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Lupoli v. LupoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Ingenuit v. HarriffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Pasqua v. PasquaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Pomirchy v. LevitinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988