Roads v. Webb
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
On Exceptions by Dependant and Agreed Statement. The case appears in the opinion. Exceptions: The declaration contains a special count upon each note, and the money counts. The demurrer being general, if one count be good, the exceptions must be overruled. Dexter Savings Bank v. Copeland, 72 Maine, 220: Concord v. Delaney, 56 Maine, 201, 204; Blanchard v. Hoxie, 34 Maine, 376, Skolfield v. Skolfield, 88 Maine, 254. Form of indorsement: 1 Daniel Neg. Ins.
Read the full summary
On Exceptions by Dependant and Agreed Statement. The case appears in the opinion. Exceptions: The declaration contains a special count upon each note, and the money counts. The demurrer being general, if one count be good, the exceptions must be overruled. Dexter Savings Bank v. Copeland, 72 Maine, 220: Concord v. Delaney, 56 Maine, 201, 204; Blanchard v. Hoxie, 34 Maine, 376, Skolfield v. Skolfield, 88 Maine, 254. Form of indorsement: 1 Daniel Neg. Ins. (3rd Ed.) § 688; Adams v. Blethen, 66 Maine, 19; Markey v. Corey, 66 N. W. Rep. 493; Maine T. B. Co. v. Butler, 45 Minn. 506; Sands v. Wood,…
1Opinion of the CourtStrout, J.
This case comes before us upon demurrer to the declaration, and an agreed statement of facts, upon which the court is to render “such final judgment as law and justice will require.’,’ The consideration of the demurrer, under this submission, becomes unimportant.
The plaintiff claims to recover from the estate of James Webb, *409the defendant’s intestate, as indorser of two notes for eleven hundred dollars each, both dated September 29, 1892, now held by plaintiff. The first reads as follows:—
“$1,100.00. Muncie, Ind. Sept. 29, 1892.
On or before one year after date we promise to pay to the order of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Scudder v. Union National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Chicago City v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
- Gormley v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sykes v. . EverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Sykes v. Citizens' National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Coats v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1907
- Katz v. Gordon Johnson CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1958
- American Machinery & Export Co. v. Druge Bros.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.