Legal Opinion
DiPompo v. West Point Military Academy
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 2, 1989No. 86 Civ. 4124 (MBM)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MUKASEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Michael V. DiPompo moves for summary judgment against defendant the United States Military Academy, West Point Military Reserve, sued here as West Point Military Academy (West Point) as to a portion of his employment discrimination suit, and moves to substitute the Secretary of the Army (the Secretary), sued in his official capacity, for defendants the chief administrative officers of West Point, sued in their official and individual capacities. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(a), 15. Defendants West Point and its chief administrative officers, as well as…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Amador Rivera v. I. Michael Heyman, Secretary, Smithsonian Institution, Luis A. Palau and Edward G. DolanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Lucenti v. PotterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Wigginton v. ServidioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Garvin v. PotterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Illingworth v. Nestle U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.