Illingworth v. Nestle U.S.A., Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LIFLAND, District Judge.
This case presents the question of whether an employer can violate the handicap provision of the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (“LAD”) when, at the time it decided to fire the employee, it indisputably lacked knowledge of the employee’s handicap. After canvassing New Jersey law and cases interpreting federal antidiscrimination statutes, the Court holds that the employer’s knowledge of the employee’s handicap is an element of the plaintiffs prima facie case. Absent such knowledge, the prima facie ease fails and the employer cannot, as a matter of law, be…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Failla v. City of PassaicCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Tynan v. VICINAGE 13 OF SUPERIOR CT.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Pensinger v. Bowsmith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Thurston v. Cherry Hill TriplexDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- Gaul v. AT & T, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.