Legal Opinion

Burten v. Milton Bradley Co.

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided August 14, 1984No. Civ. A. 81-0331 SPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SELYA, District Judge.

The plaintiffs in this case, Allen Coleman and Roger Burten, are independent game inventors. The defendant, Milton Bradley Company (MB), is a colossus which has stood astride the toy and game industry for many a moon. Jurisdiction is bottomed on diversity of citizenship and the existence of a controversy in the requisite amount. 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The parties (who agree on little else) do not dispute that the substantive issues of this litigation are governed by Massachusetts law. Accordingly, that law controls. In re Pioneer Ford Sales, 729 F.2d 27, 31 (1st…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Margaret Austin, Etc. v. Unarco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  4. Robert Robinson, Trustee in Bankruptcy of D. C. Sullivan & Co., Inc. v. Watts Detective Agency, Inc., Daniel Sullivan, Billy R. OtteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  5. Jet Spray Cooler, Inc. v. CramptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Incase Incorporated v. Timex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  2. Roger Burten D/B/A Rainy Day Games & Toys v. Milton Bradley CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  3. Hart Engineering Co. v. FMC Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1984
  4. Moore v. Marty Gilman, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
  5. DB Riley, Inc. v. AB Engineering Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API