Moore v. Marty Gilman, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NOS. 82 AND 86)
October 7, 1996
KAROL, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction
Football is a contact sport, but no more so, apparently, than the business of marketing football training equipment, if this case is any indication.
Plaintiff Myrel Moore (“Coach Moore”) was a professional football coach. In the early 1970s, while he was a special teams coach for the Denver Broncos, he observed a practice drill in which another coach would roll a large foam ball toward the knees of a defensive player, to simulate an…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Emiliano Valencia-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Park Motor Mart, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Christensen v. Kingston School CommitteeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Spottiswoode v. LevineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Daktronics, Inc. v. McAfeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- DIALOGO, LLC v. BauzaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- DIALOGO, LLC v. BauzaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.