Legal Opinion

Ciaccio v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 20, 1992No. 90-2152VPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MARGOLIS, Judge.

Petitioners failed to file a motion for review of the special master’s decision within the 30-day statutory period, and the clerk entered judgment in accordance with that decision. Petitioners move to vacate the judgment.

FACTS

Entry of judgment in accordance with the special master’s decision is automatic unless a motion for review is filed within 30 days after the date on which that decision is filed. Vaccine Rule 11(a). The special master filed a decision on June 19, 1992. The office of petitioners’ counsel (“office”) received the special master’s decision on July 6,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Placeway Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  2. Widdoss v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  3. Cleek Aviation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Patton v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. Dodson v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  3. Williams v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API