Legal Opinion
Widdoss v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided November 21, 1991No. 90-486VPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge.
This memorandum order addresses Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration of the judgment entered pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(e)(3) by the clerk of the court on July 9, 1991, which states as follows:
Pursuant to the special master’s decision on June 7, 1991, it was held that petitioner is not entitled to an award with the petition to be dismissed.
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this date, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a) that the petition is dismissed.
Vaccine Rule 11(a) provides as follows: In Absence of Motion for Review. In the absence of the filing of a motion for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm Beech David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm BeechCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Seven Elves, Incorporated v. Jack S. Eskenazi, Esko Industries, Inc., Gary Liebman and Jack RibackCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Oglala Sioux Tribe v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re KoomeWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- Yoshida International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Donovan v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Widdoss v. Secretary Of The Department Of Health And Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Widdoss v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Ciaccio v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
- Information Systems & Networks Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992