Legal Opinion
United States v. Allen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 5, 1980No. Nos. 79-1059, 79-1060 and 79-1063 to 79-1067PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
After customs interdiction of an amphibious operation to import over eight tons of marijuana, the participants were convicted of federal offenses. These appeals followed. Appellants allege the prosecution used evidence resulting from unlawful surveillance and illegal seizures and arrests, that the evidence was insufficient, and that *1377the sentences were improper. We reject these contentions and affirm.1
I. FACTS
In the summer of 1977, Arthur Allen purchased 200 acres of coastal property near Coos Bay, Oregon. The property was located in a secluded area. It came to be known…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. ManbeckCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Joaquin Garcia, Joaquin Garcia v. Margaret C. Hambrick, Warden, Metropolitan Detention Center Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. EspinosaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Frank J. MaybusherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.