Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Estate of Hanson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 9, 1984No. C8-84-191PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Appellants-Estate of Arthur Elmer Hanson and Bertha Hanson (Hansons), appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of respondent-Jean W. Hunt and from the trial court’s order denying the Hansons’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial. The jury found that the Hansons used their farmland unreasonably so as to interfere with the flow of water on Hunt’s farmland, causing him damages. Pursuant to the jury’s verdict, the trial court entered a mandamus injunction in favor of Hunt. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FA…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Enderson v. KelehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. Hiber v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. McClure v. City of Red WingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cleys v. CleysCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Kalsbeck v. Westview Clinic, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Boschee v. DuevelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Rick v. WordenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API