Legal Opinion

Kallevig v. Holmgren

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 12, 1972No. 42808PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kogosheske, Justice.

Plaintiff, John Kallevig, appeals from a denial of his post-trial motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial. Plaintiff’s actions for damages were submitted to the jury upon claims (1) that defendant Holmgren Brothers, Inc., unreasonably diverted surface waters from its 19-acre tract of land across plaintiff’s farmland, and (2) that individual defendant Merland Holmgren unreasonably diverted upon plaintiff’s land overflow and waste from an apartment building septic tank situated on a 1-acre tract adjoining the 19-acre tract.

Cons…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  2. Enderson v. KelehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Jungblum v. Minneapolis, New Ulm & Southwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  4. Donald v. MosesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Sachs v. ChiatSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Snyder v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Blatz v. Allina Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Regan v. StrombergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Pell v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. Conroy v. Book Automation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API