Legal Opinion

Hemsley v. Bew

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On order to show cause why an injunction should not issue. Heard on bill and affidavits.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The complainant seeks an injunction to restrain the completion of a jetty or dyke which is to extend into the ocean, a few feet below low-water mark, in front of the defendants’ upland, at Atlantic City, and within the limits of a grant to the defendants by the riparian commissioners of this state, on the ground that the jetty or dyke will create a continuing nuisance which will work irreparable injury to him. The injury, he insists, will be caused by obstruction of the natural flow of the ocean tides and littoral currents, resulting in eddies and new currents which will wash…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vaszil v. MolnarNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  2. Lou Menges Organization v. North Jersey Quarry Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  3. Mullins v. Merchandise, C., Union No. 641New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API