Legal Opinion
Mullins v. Merchandise, C., Union No. 641
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided June 12, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On January 6th, 1936, the complainants filed a bill of complaint against the defendant union, an unincorporated organization, and eight individuals of the union. The bill charges, and the affidavits substantiate the charges, that: (a) the affairs of the union are dominated by the defendant Joseph Markle; (b) when the members of the union complained of the actions of Markle, he threatened them with the loss of their jobs; (c) the complainants to earn their livelihood, as a matter of necessity must belong to the union; (d) Markle has refused to give an accounting or a financial statement of the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Citizens Coach Co. v. Camden Horse RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1878
- Georgia v. BrailsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1792
- City of Newton v. LevisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- Southern Pac. Co. v. EarlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Robinson v. NickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1940
- Canter, C. v. Retail Furniture, C., No. 109New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
- Ebling Brewing Co., Inc. v. Heirloom, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948