Vaszil v. Molnar
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
Rearward of the dwelling of the complainants in the Borough of Carteret, the defendants have erected on their own property a structure which the complainants suspect, and justifiably so, is presently to be inhabited by hens and presumably one or more companionable roosters. The complainants remonstrate. Endeavors to persuade the municipal authorities to interpose have been unavailing. Hence, an immediate exercise of the injunctive power of this court is implored.
It is acknowledged that the structure itself, although obviously designed to shelter domestic fowl, is not objectionable. Indeed, a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Benton v. KernanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
- Hemsley v. BewNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1895
- Newark Aqueduct Board v. City of PassaicNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1889
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. MarkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Hyde v. Somerset Air ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
- Lieberman v. Saddle River Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Priory v. Borough of ManasquanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Lou Menges Organization v. North Jersey Quarry Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.