Legal Opinion

In Re the Care & Treatment of McCoy

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 23, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Appellant was found guilty of committing a lewd act on a minor. He was subsequently found to be a sexually violent predator pursuant to the South Carolina Sexually Violent Predator Act (SVP Act), 1 and was involuntarily committed to the South Carolina Department of Mental Health.

Thereafter, appellant filed a notice of appeal. Counsel for appellant, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Johnson v. State, 294 S.C. 310, 364 S.E.2d 201 (1988), and Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), filed an affidavit with the Court stating…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  3. Ex Parte CauthenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Jeffrey Allen ChapmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  2. State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. In the Matter of Jeffrey Allen ChapmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  4. in Re the Commitment of Carl Lee Rayson, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2007
  5. in Re the Commitment of Joel Scott Clark, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API