Legal Opinion

Guindon v. Brusky

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 21, 1919No. 21,106PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action in the district court for Ramsey county to recover $325-. The case was tried before Olin B. Lewis, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for the amount demanded. Judgment was entered pursuant to the verdict. Defendant’s motion to cancel the judgment of record, because of his being adjudged a bankrupt after the entry and docketing of the judgment, was granted, Olin B. Lewis, J. From the order granting the motion, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant on June 1Ó, 1916, for $352.11. Afterwards the defendant was adjudged a bankrupt and on December 18, 1916, received his discharge. The defendant made the application authorized by G. S. 1913, § 7914, to discharge the judgment of record because of the discharge in bankruptcy. An order discharging the judgment was entered and the plaintiff appeals.

1. A discharge in bankruptcy releases a bankrupt from all of his provable debts with certain exceptions. The judgment was scheduled and proved. That it was a provable debt is not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re GroutSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  2. In re LevitanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1915
  3. Hallagan v. DowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  4. Sherwood v. MitchellNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  5. VanNorman v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. LineberryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Emigh v. LohnesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Anderson v. SundstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Davis v. HoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API