Legal Opinion

Nash v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 28, 1966No. 65-506PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant was informed against, tried before a jury and found guilty of conspiracy to commit grand larceny and grand larceny. The sentences are fifteen months in the State penitentiary on the conspiracy to commit grand larceny and five years on the grand larceny, the sentences to run concurrently.

On this appeal, the appellant raises three points. The first point questions the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction of conspiracy to commit grand larceny. The second point questions the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction for grand larceny. The third point…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
  2. State v. TrafficanteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. Ricard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rhoden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  2. Whitehead v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  3. Nash v. PurdyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1968
  4. Roberts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  5. Jacobs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API