Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 8, 1972No. 71-415Published

1Opinion of the Court

HOBSON, Judge.

Appellant was found guilty on an information charging him with uttering a forged instrument. After entry of judgment and sentence appellant appealed. ■

The State’s proof of guilt was based upon circumstantial evidence. It has been long established in the State of Florida that in criminal prosecutions where circumstantial evidence is relied on for proof of guilt, such evidence must not only be consistent with defendant’s guilt, but it must be inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence. LaMonte v. State, Fla.App.1962, 145 So.2d 889; Nash v. State, Fla.App.1966, 188…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. LaMonte v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  2. Rhoden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  3. Nash v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API