Legal Opinion
Pine v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 26, 1943No. 10336PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
Charged with having conspired with named and unnamed persons to violate the Mann Act, 1 that is to say, with having conspired to transport women and girls in interstate commerce to work in the LaPaloma Club in Miami under depraved and debauched surroundings and conditions which would induce and lead them to a course and life of sexual immorality, appellant was found guilty as charged and sentenced to be fined and imprisoned. Conceding that the indictment charges an offense under Athanasaw v. United States, 227 U.S. 326, 33 S.Ct. 285, 57 L.Ed. 528, Ann.Cas.1913E, 911,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Holmgren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- United States v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Diggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Bernardino Chirez Hernandez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- VanWoundenberg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
- Raymond E. McMillen Jr. v. United States of America, Douglas Gruchy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
- J. W. Williamson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Joe E. GrissomCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.