Legal Opinion

Jebousek v. City of Newport

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 5, 1998No. 97-182; CA A101951PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s decision affirming a lot line adjustment that the City of Newport allowed to facilitate the development of a planned residence on property near petitioner’s. This matter was before us previously in Jebousek v. City of Newport, 147 Or App 100, 935 P2d 452 (1997), where we remanded for further consideration of the effect, if any, of Goal 1, policy 3, of the Natural Features Component of the city’s comprehensive plan (policy 3) on the permissibility of development on the sloped property. Policy 3 provides:

“Where hazardous areas have not been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goose Hollow Foothills League v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Jebousek v. City of NewportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jebousek v. City of NewportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Department of Land Conservation & Development v. Tillamook CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API