Legal Opinion

Scott v. Fox Bros. Enterprises, Inc.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1983No. 82CA0252PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Defendant, Fox Brothers Enterprises, Inc. (Fox Brothers), appeals from a decree entered in favor of plaintiffs, Jack Scott, Mary Scott, and Steve Gragg (the Scotts). The decree required Fox Brothers to render specific performance of a contract to sell real property. We affirm.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. A “Receipt and Option” agreement was entered into wherein for the sum of $20,000 Fox Brothers agreed to convey to one Clayton Canfield Lot 23 together with a one year option to purchase Lot 24 in a subdivision known as Fox Estates. The agreement contained no…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Board of County Com'rs of Pitkin County v. PfeiferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  3. Connolly v. Des Moines & Central Iowa Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  4. Clark v. SheltonUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Matson v. WhiteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brown v. City And County OfCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. Parrish Chiropractic Centers, P.C. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. Roberts v. Holland & HartColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Parrish v. Rocky Mountain Hospital & Medical Services Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Regency Realty Investors, LLC v. Cleary Fire Protection, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API