Legal Opinion

Dunning v. Township Drain Commissioner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1880PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Certiorari to Drain Commissioner and Township Clerk.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

This is a proceeding instituted to set aside the action of the respondent as township drain commissioner of Essex in Clinton county, and of the jury summoned by him, in laying out a township drain, tailing land for the purpose, •and assessing the costs. All the errors assigned relate to the finding of the jury and the previous proceedings, arid with the exception of those which relate to the giving of notice to the parties concerned and the filing of proof thereof, are somewhat technical. It appears from the return'that plaintiff in certiorari had actual notice and took part in the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. HentigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. City of Perry v. Davis & YoungerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  3. Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. AshleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Harneck v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. In Re Fitch Drain No. 129Michigan Supreme Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API