Legal Opinion

Dunbar v. Cranor

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 23, 1953No. 297_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Chief Judge.

Dunbar petitions for a second’ rehearing on his motion to me for a certificate of probable causé for appeal, which has twice previously been denied because of thfe failure to comply with certain procedural requirements. These requirements now having been met, I will proceed to consider the motion on its merits.

The appeal is from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, Southern Division, dismissing Dunbar’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The record indicates that the district court relied upon two grounds in dismissing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  2. In Re Pierce v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. In RE SCOTT v. CallahanWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. United States ex rel. Goodman v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Limmie West, III v. State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Peyton v. NordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Elbert Blango v. Richard R. Thornburgh J. Michael Quinlan Gary L. Henman Mayor, Washington, D.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. State v. DallmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. State v. DallmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API