Legal Opinion

Tyler v. Barry

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided April 25, 1953No. File 87424PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

The defendant The Frederick Gumm Chemical Company, Inc., pleads in abatement and to the jurisdiction claiming that no legal service was made upon it.

It appears from the writ and complaint that said defendant is a nonresident located in New Jersey. Service was made on said defendant in the manner provided in § 7779 of the General Statutes, by serving a copy of the writ, summons and complaint on the commissioner of motor vehicles, as attorney for the defendant, and by mailing a copy thereof, by registered mail, to the defendant at its New Jersey address. It further appears from the allegations…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Hartley v. VitielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  3. Boylston v. StaufferConnecticut Superior Court · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Larrivee v. McGannConnecticut Superior Court · 1967
  2. Holt v. DehayConnecticut Superior Court · 1963
  3. Hammond v. ParkerConnecticut Superior Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API