Legal Opinion

Larrivee v. McGann

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 28, 1967No. File 30623PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMeyers, J.

In the instant plea in abatement, the defendant claims that this court does not have jurisdiction in personam of him because of the failure of the service in this cause to be made in accordance with General Statutes § 52-62 or § 52-63. Section 52-62 sets out the conditions and requirements necessary to effectuate valid constructive or substituted service of process on a nonresident in an action for negligent operation of a motor vehicle upon any public highway of this state. Section 52-63 provides, in an action for such a cause, for similar service on a motor vehicle operator or owner who is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Brauer MacHine & Supply Co. Ex Rel. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Parkhill Truck Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Hartley v. VitielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  4. Dixie Feed & Seed Co. v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1963
  5. Carter v. CarterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walmsley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Medeiros v. KayeConnecticut Superior Court · 1974
  3. Carter v. Trumpler, No. 333155 (Oct. 16, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
  4. Hyde v. Gonzalez-Aguillon, No. Cv01 0806035 S (Jan. 2, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
  5. Maas v. Coleman, No. Cv 330618 (Aug. 5, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API