Legal Opinion

Port Of Bellingham v. State Of Alaska

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 14, 2016No. 72925-0-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTrickey, J.

¶1 The Port of Bellingham (Port) and the State of Alaska, through the Alaska Marine Highway System (AMHS), agreed to a lease in 2009 regarding AMHS ferries using the Port’s terminal. When an AMHS employee sued the Port for negligently causing injuries to her while working for AMHS, the Port impleaded Alaska based on provisions in the lease. But Alaska, by statute, retains sovereign immunity for any claim that arises out of an injury to a state-employed seaman.

¶2 Alaska argues that the Port’s claims fall within Alaska’s sovereign immunity, which AMHS officials did not have authority to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. LaMon v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Tenore v. AT&T Wireless ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Cerrillo v. EsparzaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Cerrillo v. EsparzaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. Northwest Magnesite Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adamson v. Port of BellinghamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Eric S. Levine v. City Of DuvallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  3. Viceroy Group, Llc, Et Ano v. Tok, Llc, Et AnoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API