Legal Opinion
Trujillo v. Pacific Safety Supply
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 8, 2002No. 96-10056; A99410Published
1Opinion of the Court
45 P.3d 1017 (2002)
181 Or. App. 302
In the Matter of the Compensation of Consuelo Trujillo, Claimant.
Consuelo TRUJILLO, Petitioner,
v.
PACIFIC SAFETY SUPPLY and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.
96-10056; A99410.
Court of Appeals of Oregon, En Banc.
Submitted on Remand August 7, 2001.
Resubmitted February 6, 2002.
Decided May 8, 2002.
Max Rae, Salem, for petitioner.
David Runner, Salem, for respondents.
Before DEITS, Chief Judge, and EDMONDS, LANDAU, HASELTON, ARMSTRONG, LINDER, WOLLHEIM, KISTLER, BREWER, and SCHUMAN, Judges.
Resubmitted En Banc February 6, 2002.
LANDAU, J.
The Oregon Supreme Court remanded…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Landon v. PlasenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GeistOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Carr v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.