Legal Opinion

Ruby v. Bishop

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 19, 1953No. 4593_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

Appellants brought this quiet title and ejectment action as successors to the re-maindermen under the will of Lou B. Pasell against the Appellees whose asserted interests are derived from the powers of sale and disposition granted under the terms of the will.

Federal jurisdiction is based upon existing diversity of citizenship and requisite amount in controversy.

The testatrix, Lou B. Pasell, died April 1, 1921 seized of Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10, Block “N”, Oak Park Addition to Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. The will devised the property to her husband, Henry Pasell, “to be used and…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Davis v. KleindienstArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Lee v. SimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Stocker v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Mutual Life Insurance v. ShipmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Morford v. DieffenbackerMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blessing v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. United States v. MarrapeseDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API