Legal Opinion

Piluso v. Cohen

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 6, 2000PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, J.:

¶ 1 Rose Ann Piluso appeals from the January 4, 2000 Order granting the motion for summary judgment of appellees, Harry S. Cohen and Cohen and Derenzo, in this legal malpractice action.

¶ 2 A jury trial on appellant’s underlying medical malpractice action was scheduled to be held on October 14, 1996. After jury selection, the case was settled with respect to the hospital and two doctors for $100,000 (the settling defendants) by counsel for appellant, Cohen (an appellee herein). The settlement agreement was reached in chambers and not in the presence of appellant. The case then…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Muhammad v. Strassburger, McKenna, Messer, Shilobod & GutnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Yarnall v. Yorkshire Worsted MillsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Bullman v. GiuntoliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Baumgartner v. WhinneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Greentree Cinemas, Inc. v. HakimSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Step Plan Services, Inc. v. KoreskoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. David Pflumm Paving & Excavating, Inc. v. Foundation Services Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Dugan v. O'HaraDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Shaw Resources Ltd. v. Pruitt, Gushee & Bachtell, P.C.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2006
  5. Ryan v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API