Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Co. v. Kuntz
Washington Supreme Court
1Per curiam
A single question is presented on this appeal: Was the plaintiff corporation doing business in this state to the extent that it was required to pay a corporate license fee to the state of Washington as a condition precedent to the maintenance of its action. The trial court concluded that it was.
The undisputed facts are that defendant executed a promissory note in favor of plaintiff, made two installment *675payments and then declined to make additional payments. The promissory note was marked as an exhibit, admitted and the plaintiff thereupon rested his case. Plaintiff neither pleaded nor proved…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- International Text Book Co. v. . ToneNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- International Shoe Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Smith Company v. DickinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Whitaker v. Spiegel, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
- Yangming Marine Transport Corp. v. Revon Products U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Green Thumb, Inc. v. TiegsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- LAWYERS CO-OP. PUB. CO. v. KuntzWashington Supreme Court · 1968