Legal Opinion

Giegling v. Helmbold

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1959No. Docket 9, Calendar 48,038PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

Defendants and appellants, Mr. and Mrs. Helmbold, appeal from a decree entered by Circuit Judge Gadola. The decree granted plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Giegling and Mrs. Barnes, an injunction and dismissed the Helmbolds’ cross bill. The injunction restrained the Helmbolds from removing a fence which the Gieglings, as titleholders under a prior circuit court decree, had erected on a 6' x 23' piece of property. The Helmbolds’ cross bill sought to dispute plaintiffs’ title to the strip, asserting that it was actually part of a public street and that the Helmbolds had rights of ingress and egress…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tucker v. RohrbackMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Horton v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Phelps v. Stott Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Reid v. GoodenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Jenness v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thom v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Jordan v. CA Roberts CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Jordan v. CA Roberts CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Leeal v. Ditech Financial LLC, f/k/a Green Tree Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API