Ries v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.

This action was brought by respondent against appellant upon three causes of action. . The complaint alleges in the first cause of action that under a parol contract made in the fall of 1927 respondent sold and delivered to appellant five carloads of prunes, and that there is still due and owing to respondent under said contract a balance in the sum of $696.45. In the second cause of action respondent alleges that during the fall of 1927, under a written con tract, he sold and delivered to appellant one and one-half carloads of prunes; that while the written contract stipulated that he was to…