Legal Opinion

Hallam v. Holland America Line, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 2008No. S-12573, S-12584PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Stuart Hallam, a former employee of the Holland America Line-Westours Company, appeals the superior court's dismissal of his class action, maintaining that (1) Holland America Line-Westours, Holland America Line-USA, and all of the companies' Alaska subsidiaries (Holland America) failed to pay adequate overtime compensation to employees, and (2) Holland America failed to timely pay compensation to terminated employees within three days, as required by AS 28.05.140(b). In light of the plain language of the statute, the legislature's unambiguous…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Xerox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Stepanov v. GavrilovichAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. West v. Umialik Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Monzon v. Schaefer Ambulance Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Petrolane Inc. v. RoblesAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kendre Jones v. Vieanna JonesAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Robert A. v. Tatiana D.Alaska Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Yuk v. RobertsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Bodo v. AngasanDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2024
  5. City of Valdez v. Prince William Sound Oil Spill Response Corporation, State of Alaska, Department of Revenue, and State Assessment Review BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API