Legal Opinion

Bell v. Carlson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1954No. 7993PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PORTER, Chief Justice.

By this action, appellants seek to recover for damages to the automobile of appellant Bell resulting from a collision with an automobile driven by respondent, William Carlson, and owned by his father, respondent, Victor Carlson. By their complaint, appellants allege the collision was caused by the negligence of respondent, William Carlson, in the operation of the Carlson automobile. By their answer, respondents deny the allegations of the complaint and affirmatively allege that the damages were proximately contributed to and caused by the negligence of appellant Bell.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. EwingIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Pittman v. SatherIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Keyes v. HawleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Madron v. McCoyIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Maire v. Minidoka County Motor Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Schaefer v. Elswood Trailer SalesIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Riley v. LarsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Dawson v. OlsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Laidlaw v. BarkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Domingo v. PhillipsIdaho Supreme Court · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API