Legal Opinion

Willie W. Nickel v. Robert D. Hannigan, Warden, Hutchinson Correctional Facility, and Attorney General of Kansas

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 30, 1996No. 94-3417PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal, Willie W. Nickel claims that the district court erred in dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 because his trial counsel, William Mize, provided him with ineffective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Mr. Nickel claims that Mr. Mize was ineffective because he failed to object both to trial testimony that was purportedly privileged and to the admission of Mr. Nickel’s allegedly involuntary statements to the police. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. United States v. WarshakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. Gary Randall Hoxsie v. Dareld Kerby, Warden Tom Udall, Attorney General for the State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. SquillacoteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  4. Danny Hill v. Carl Anderson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. State v. RiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API