Legal Opinion

Hurley v. Hurley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 3, 1985No. 351PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The issue in this appeal is whether a verdict for personal injuries sustained by a spouse prior to separation, where the verdict is recovered and satisfied by payment after separation, is marital property for purposes of effecting equitable distribution between the spouses. The trial court held the verdict to be marital property and included the proceeds in its decree of distribution. We reverse.

John Hurley (appellee) and Thelma Hurley (appellant) were married in 1955, separated in January, 1981, and divorced in 1983. At the time of hearings in the divorce action, the husband…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Semasek v. SemasekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. King v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Platek v. PlatekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Amato v. AmatoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  5. Sensenig v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hedlund Manufacturing Co. v. Weiser, Stapler & SpivakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. DeMasi v. DeMasiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Beasley v. BeasleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Prevish v. Northwest Medical Center—Oil City CampusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Unkle v. UnkleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API