Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Burgess

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 21, 1956No. 15596Published

1Opinion of the Court

239 F.2d 484

James P. MITCHELL, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Appellant,

v.

E. E. BURGESS and M. E. Burgess, doing business as Coy Gin Co., and Ruben Compton and Harold Coggins, doing business as Coy Delinting Co., Appellees.

No. 15596.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

December 21, 1956.

Sylvia S. Ellison, Atty., United States Department of Labor, Washington, D. C. (Stuart Rothman, Solicitor, Bessie Margolin, Asst. Solicitor, Harry A. Tuell, Washington, D. C., Attorney, and Earl Street, Regional Atty., Dallas, Tex., for United States Department of Labor, on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maneja v. Waialua Agricultural Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Abram v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1942
  3. Abram v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1943
  4. Heaburg v. Independent Oil Mill, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1942
  5. Mitchell v. BurgessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API